Huawei Mate 30 RS vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 30 RS vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (807 points vs 489 points)
Against:
Higher price (1814.11 USD vs 1698.21 USD)
Worse camera (821 points vs 928 points)
Worse battery (643 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (989 points vs 997 points)
Worse connectivity (832 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (675 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (12288 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.36 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (1698.21 USD vs 1814.11 USD)
Better camera (928 points vs 821 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 643 points)
Better performance (997 points vs 989 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 832 points)
Better display (928 points vs 675 points)
Against:
Worse design (489 points vs 807 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (16384 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 94.36 percents)