Samsung Galaxy Note5 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy Note5 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (155.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better display (881 points vs 631 points)
Better design (516 points vs 203 points)
Against:
Worse camera (427 points vs 816 points)
Worse battery (81 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (464 points vs 671 points)
Worse connectivity (583 points vs 850 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (15.87 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (8 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (772 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.06 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (816 points vs 427 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 81 points)
Better performance (671 points vs 464 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 583 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 155.99 USD)
Worse display (631 points vs 881 points)
Worse design (203 points vs 516 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.87 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 772 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 8 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.7 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 77.06 percents)