Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (997 points vs 964 points)
Better design (564 points vs 394 points)
Against:
Higher price (403 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse battery (889 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (701 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (479 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (877 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 403 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 889 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 701 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 479 points)
Better display (900 points vs 877 points)
Against:
Worse camera (964 points vs 997 points)
Worse design (394 points vs 564 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 88.05 percents)