Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (997 points vs 964 points)
Better design (563 points vs 393 points)
Against:
Higher price (539 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse battery (888 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (701 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (877 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 539 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 888 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 701 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 395 points)
Better display (900 points vs 877 points)
Against:
Worse camera (964 points vs 997 points)
Worse design (393 points vs 563 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 88.05 percents)