Huawei nova 6 SE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: Huawei nova 6 SE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (331.81 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Better performance (893 points vs 725 points)
Against:
Worse camera (640 points vs 779 points)
Worse battery (544 points vs 579 points)
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (497 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (557 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2270 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.74 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (779 points vs 640 points)
Better battery (579 points vs 544 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 374 points)
Better display (910 points vs 497 points)
Better design (993 points vs 557 points)
Against:
Higher price (358.24 USD vs 331.81 USD)
Worse performance (725 points vs 893 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2270 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.4 inches)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.48 percents vs 83.74 percents)