Huawei nova 6 SE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: Huawei nova 6 SE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (331.81 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Better performance (893 points vs 726 points)
Against:
Worse camera (641 points vs 780 points)
Worse battery (544 points vs 579 points)
Worse connectivity (376 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (499 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (559 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2270 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.74 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (780 points vs 641 points)
Better battery (579 points vs 544 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 376 points)
Better display (910 points vs 499 points)
Better design (993 points vs 559 points)
Against:
Higher price (358.24 USD vs 331.81 USD)
Worse performance (726 points vs 893 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2270 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.4 inches)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.48 percents vs 83.74 percents)