UMiDIGI A3S vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI A3S vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (81.99 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Better connectivity (756 points vs 293 points)
Against:
Worse camera (517 points vs 704 points)
Worse battery (376 points vs 530 points)
Worse performance (160 points vs 281 points)
Worse display (129 points vs 514 points)
Worse design (343 points vs 576 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3950mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.06 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (704 points vs 517 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 376 points)
Better performance (281 points vs 160 points)
Better display (514 points vs 129 points)
Better design (576 points vs 343 points)
Against:
Higher price (89.99 USD vs 81.99 USD)
Worse connectivity (293 points vs 756 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 3950mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 75.06 percents)