Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Xiaomi Mi 10
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Xiaomi Mi 10
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (954 points vs 928 points)
Better connectivity (947 points vs 639 points)
Better display (966 points vs 901 points)
Better design (989 points vs 832 points)
Against:
Higher price (866.49 USD vs 500.25 USD)
Worse camera (186 points vs 974 points)
Worse battery (222 points vs 766 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 4780mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2950 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.7 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Higher pixel density (425 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.78 percents vs 90.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (500.25 USD vs 866.49 USD)
Better camera (974 points vs 186 points)
Better battery (766 points vs 222 points)
Against:
Worse performance (928 points vs 954 points)
Worse connectivity (639 points vs 947 points)
Worse display (901 points vs 966 points)
Worse design (832 points vs 989 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4780mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2950 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.67 inch vs 6.7 inch)
Lower pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 425 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 82.78 percents)