Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Doogee S59 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Doogee S59 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (700 points vs 520 points)
Better performance (725 points vs 399 points)
Better display (772 points vs 209 points)
Better design (664 points vs 75 points)
Against:
Higher price (224.79 USD vs 206.99 USD)
Worse battery (742 points vs 983 points)
Worse connectivity (258 points vs 883 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5020mAh vs 10050mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.71 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 295 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 61.91 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (206.99 USD vs 224.79 USD)
Better battery (983 points vs 742 points)
Better connectivity (883 points vs 258 points)
Against:
Worse camera (520 points vs 700 points)
Worse performance (399 points vs 725 points)
Worse display (209 points vs 772 points)
Worse design (75 points vs 664 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10050mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.71 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (295 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.91 percents vs 84.78 percents)