Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Nokia 1.4
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Nokia 1.4
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (681 points vs 53 points)
Better battery (857 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (551 points vs 99 points)
Better display (775 points vs 264 points)
Better design (667 points vs 508 points)
Against:
Higher price (215 USD vs 199.03 USD)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 373 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 80.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (199.03 USD vs 215 USD)
Better connectivity (373 points vs 263 points)
Against:
Worse camera (53 points vs 681 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 857 points)
Worse performance (99 points vs 551 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 775 points)
Worse design (508 points vs 667 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.64 percents vs 84.78 percents)