Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (369.19 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Better design (883 points vs 387 points)
Against:
Worse camera (667 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (538 points vs 928 points)
Worse performance (742 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (636 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (896 points vs 899 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (14.48 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4160mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.57 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.25 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (964 points vs 667 points)
Better battery (928 points vs 538 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 742 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 636 points)
Better display (899 points vs 896 points)
Against:
Higher price (384.99 USD vs 369.19 USD)
Worse design (387 points vs 883 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 14.48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4160mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.57 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 87.25 percents)