Huawei Honor 30 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor 30 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (899 points vs 387 points)
Against:
Higher price (536.1 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (835 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (374 points vs 928 points)
Worse performance (259 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (803 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (662 points vs 899 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2580 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.83 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 536.1 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 835 points)
Better battery (928 points vs 374 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 259 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 803 points)
Better display (899 points vs 662 points)
Against:
Worse design (387 points vs 899 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2580 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 86.83 percents)