Oppo A72 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: Oppo A72 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (290.41 USD vs 317 USD)
Better performance (867 points vs 701 points)
Better design (749 points vs 563 points)
Against:
Worse camera (672 points vs 979 points)
Worse battery (772 points vs 888 points)
Worse connectivity (291 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (549 points vs 877 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.75 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (979 points vs 672 points)
Better battery (888 points vs 772 points)
Better connectivity (477 points vs 291 points)
Better display (877 points vs 549 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 290.41 USD)
Worse performance (701 points vs 867 points)
Worse design (563 points vs 749 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 82.75 percents)