Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (317 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Better camera (979 points vs 377 points)
Better battery (889 points vs 749 points)
Against:
Worse performance (701 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (479 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (877 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (564 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (88.05 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (757 points vs 701 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 479 points)
Better display (996 points vs 877 points)
Better design (967 points vs 564 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 317 USD)
Worse camera (377 points vs 979 points)
Worse battery (749 points vs 889 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 88.05 percents)