Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs UMiDIGI A7s
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs UMiDIGI A7s
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (704 points vs 511 points)
Better performance (281 points vs 74 points)
Better display (514 points vs 283 points)
Better design (576 points vs 453 points)
Against:
Higher price (89.99 USD vs 76 USD)
Worse battery (530 points vs 533 points)
Worse connectivity (293 points vs 610 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1250 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 1 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (76 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Better battery (533 points vs 530 points)
Better connectivity (610 points vs 293 points)
Against:
Worse camera (511 points vs 704 points)
Worse performance (74 points vs 281 points)
Worse display (283 points vs 514 points)
Worse design (453 points vs 576 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4150mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1250 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.64 percents vs 84.08 percents)