Vivo X50 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: Vivo X50 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (894 points vs 601 points)
Better performance (896 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Higher price (748.17 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse battery (610 points vs 773 points)
Worse connectivity (610 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (801 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (951 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4315mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.56 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (90.96 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 748.17 USD)
Better battery (773 points vs 610 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 610 points)
Better display (996 points vs 801 points)
Better design (991 points vs 951 points)
Against:
Worse camera (601 points vs 894 points)
Worse performance (757 points vs 896 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4315mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.56 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 90.96 percents)