Huawei Honor 30 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor 30 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (364.01 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Better design (715 points vs 393 points)
Against:
Worse camera (652 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (732 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (178 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (549 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.92 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (964 points vs 652 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 732 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 178 points)
Better display (900 points vs 549 points)
Against:
Higher price (384.99 USD vs 364.01 USD)
Worse design (393 points vs 715 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 84.92 percents)