Huawei Enjoy 20 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Huawei Enjoy 20 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (659 points vs 393 points)
Against:
Higher price (388.51 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (652 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (544 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (557 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (178 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (656 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (387 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.46 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 388.51 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 652 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 544 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 557 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 178 points)
Better display (900 points vs 656 points)
Against:
Worse design (393 points vs 659 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 387 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.59 inch vs 6.8 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 84.46 percents)