Asus ROG Phone 3 vs Motorola Moto G50
Compare Phones: Asus ROG Phone 3 vs Motorola Moto G50
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (964 points vs 693 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 713 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 537 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 897 points)
Better display (900 points vs 247 points)
Against:
Higher price (384.99 USD vs 368.12 USD)
Worse design (394 points vs 504 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 82.86 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (368.12 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Better design (504 points vs 394 points)
Against:
Worse camera (693 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (713 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (537 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (897 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (247 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.86 percents vs 80.18 percents)