Realme C15 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Realme C15 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (928 points vs 900 points)
Better design (494 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Higher price (163.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (238 points vs 764 points)
Worse performance (187 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (217 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (242 points vs 684 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (8.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.9 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 163.99 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 238 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 187 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 217 points)
Better display (684 points vs 242 points)
Against:
Worse battery (900 points vs 928 points)
Worse design (441 points vs 494 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 8.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 83.9 percents)