Realme C15 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Realme C15 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (927 points vs 900 points)
Better design (500 points vs 447 points)
Against:
Higher price (163.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (238 points vs 766 points)
Worse performance (188 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (223 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (242 points vs 688 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (8.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.9 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 163.99 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 238 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 188 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 223 points)
Better display (688 points vs 242 points)
Against:
Worse battery (900 points vs 927 points)
Worse design (447 points vs 500 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 8.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 83.9 percents)