Huawei nova 8 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: Huawei nova 8 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (429.67 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse camera (775 points vs 779 points)
Worse battery (358 points vs 579 points)
Worse performance (467 points vs 725 points)
Worse connectivity (670 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (476 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (970 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (63.7 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3800mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2580 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (89.59 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 429.67 USD)
Better camera (779 points vs 775 points)
Better battery (579 points vs 358 points)
Better performance (725 points vs 467 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 670 points)
Better display (910 points vs 476 points)
Better design (993 points vs 970 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 63.7 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 3800mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2580 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 89.59 percents)