Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 169.71 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 113 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 712 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 113 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 57 points)
Better display (684 points vs 180 points)
Against:
Worse design (441 points vs 516 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 259 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 84.99 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (516 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Higher price (169.71 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (113 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (712 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (113 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (57 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (180 points vs 684 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (259 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.99 percents vs 83.7 percents)