Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Nokia 1.4
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Nokia 1.4
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 199.03 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 53 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 99 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 374 points)
Better display (688 points vs 264 points)
Against:
Worse design (447 points vs 509 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 80.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (509 points vs 447 points)
Against:
Higher price (199.03 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (53 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (99 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 688 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.64 percents vs 83.7 percents)