Nokia 1.4 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 1.4 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (199.03 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (53 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (99 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (374 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (509 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.64 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 199.03 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 53 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 99 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 374 points)
Better display (994 points vs 264 points)
Better design (928 points vs 509 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.52 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 80.64 percents)