Huawei Mate 40E 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

For:

      Better camera (753 points vs 596 points)

      Better performance (786 points vs 754 points)

      Better connectivity (896 points vs 831 points)

Against:

      Higher price (987.83 USD vs 739.72 USD)

      Worse battery (543 points vs 773 points)

      Worse display (625 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (797 points vs 991 points)

For:

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

      Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (89.59 percents vs 91.65 percents)

For:

      Lower price (739.72 USD vs 987.83 USD)

      Better battery (773 points vs 543 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 625 points)

      Better design (991 points vs 797 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (596 points vs 753 points)

      Worse performance (754 points vs 786 points)

      Worse connectivity (831 points vs 896 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4200mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)

      More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.5 inches)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 89.59 percents)