OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 780 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 579 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 726 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 833 points)
Better display (994 points vs 910 points)
Against:
Worse design (929 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (993 points vs 929 points)
Against:
Higher price (358.24 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (780 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (579 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (726 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (833 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (910 points vs 994 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 92.12 percents)