OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
Compare Phones: OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 383.33 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 810 points)
Better performance (754 points vs 590 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 725 points)
Better display (994 points vs 936 points)
Better design (928 points vs 864 points)
Against:
Worse battery (642 points vs 867 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5065mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 3000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 886 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 86.5 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (867 points vs 642 points)
Against:
Higher price (383.33 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (810 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (590 points vs 754 points)
Worse connectivity (725 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (936 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (864 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5065mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (886 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.67 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.5 percents vs 92.12 percents)