OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Compare Phones: OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 282.97 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 746 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 486 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 476 points)
Better display (994 points vs 889 points)
Better design (929 points vs 683 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 713 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 83.77 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (713 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (282.97 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (746 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (486 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (889 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (683 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.77 percents vs 92.12 percents)