OnePlus 9 Pro vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Compare Phones: OnePlus 9 Pro vs POCO M3 Pro 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 239.43 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 764 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 262 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 679 points)
Better display (994 points vs 713 points)
Better design (928 points vs 540 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 712 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 83.94 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (712 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (239.43 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (764 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (262 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (713 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (540 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.94 percents vs 92.12 percents)