Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Honor 50
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Honor 50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 439.57 USD)
Better performance (726 points vs 641 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 604 points)
Better display (910 points vs 757 points)
Better design (993 points vs 969 points)
Against:
Worse camera (780 points vs 986 points)
Worse battery (579 points vs 584 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 90.03 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (986 points vs 780 points)
Better battery (584 points vs 579 points)
Against:
Higher price (439.57 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse performance (641 points vs 726 points)
Worse connectivity (604 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (757 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (969 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.55 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.03 percents vs 85.48 percents)