Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Honor 50
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Honor 50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 439.57 USD)
Better performance (725 points vs 640 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 603 points)
Better display (910 points vs 756 points)
Better design (993 points vs 968 points)
Against:
Worse camera (779 points vs 986 points)
Worse battery (579 points vs 585 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 392 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 90.03 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (986 points vs 779 points)
Better battery (585 points vs 579 points)
Against:
Higher price (439.57 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse performance (640 points vs 725 points)
Worse connectivity (603 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (756 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (968 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 6.55 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (392 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.03 percents vs 85.48 percents)