Samsung Galaxy R vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy R vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (2199.7 USD vs 662.31 USD)
Worse camera (9 points vs 951 points)
Worse battery (6 points vs 703 points)
Worse performance (7 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (6 points vs 990 points)
Worse design (96 points vs 907 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1650mAh vs 4510mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (300 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.2 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Lower pixel density (222 pixels per inch vs 513 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.06 percents vs 91.14 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (662.31 USD vs 2199.7 USD)
Better camera (951 points vs 9 points)
Better battery (703 points vs 6 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 7 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 30 points)
Better display (990 points vs 6 points)
Better design (907 points vs 96 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4510mAh vs 1650mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 300 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 4.2 inches)
Higher pixel density (513 pixels per inch vs 222 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.14 percents vs 61.06 percents)