Samsung Galaxy R vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy R vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (2199.7 USD vs 1698.21 USD)
Worse camera (9 points vs 929 points)
Worse battery (6 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (7 points vs 997 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (6 points vs 929 points)
Worse design (97 points vs 490 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1650mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (300 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.2 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Lower pixel density (222 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.06 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (1698.21 USD vs 2199.7 USD)
Better camera (929 points vs 9 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 6 points)
Better performance (997 points vs 7 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 30 points)
Better display (929 points vs 6 points)
Better design (490 points vs 97 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 1650mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 300 megahertz)
More ram (16384 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 4.2 inches)
Higher pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 222 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.98 percents vs 61.06 percents)