Sony Xperia Z3 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z3 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (242 points vs 74 points)
Better connectivity (679 points vs 609 points)
Against:
Higher price (78 USD vs 76 USD)
Worse camera (493 points vs 510 points)
Worse battery (109 points vs 533 points)
Worse display (275 points vs 282 points)
Worse design (358 points vs 451 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3100mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 1250 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 1 cores)
Against:
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (76 USD vs 78 USD)
Better camera (510 points vs 493 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 109 points)
Better display (282 points vs 275 points)
Better design (451 points vs 358 points)
Against:
Worse performance (74 points vs 242 points)
Worse connectivity (609 points vs 679 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3100mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1250 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 4 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.64 percents vs 71.14 percents)