Sony Xperia Z2 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z2 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (230 points vs 74 points)
Against:
Higher price (79 USD vs 76 USD)
Worse camera (494 points vs 511 points)
Worse battery (126 points vs 533 points)
Worse connectivity (437 points vs 610 points)
Worse display (276 points vs 283 points)
Worse design (261 points vs 453 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3200mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1250 megahertz)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 1 cores)
Against:
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.5 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (76 USD vs 79 USD)
Better camera (511 points vs 494 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 126 points)
Better connectivity (610 points vs 437 points)
Better display (283 points vs 276 points)
Better design (453 points vs 261 points)
Against:
Worse performance (74 points vs 230 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1250 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 4 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.64 percents vs 69.5 percents)