Sony Xperia Z1 Compact vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z1 Compact vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (61.98 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (241 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (29 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (153 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (328 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (24 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (107 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2300mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.3 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (342 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (62.04 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 61.98 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 241 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 29 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 153 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 328 points)
Better display (630 points vs 24 points)
Better design (670 points vs 107 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 4.3 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 342 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 62.04 percents)