Sony Xperia Z1 vs Xiaomi Mi 10T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z1 vs Xiaomi Mi 10T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (68 USD vs 426 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (472 points vs 861 points)
Worse battery (81 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (153 points vs 831 points)
Worse connectivity (323 points vs 557 points)
Worse display (198 points vs 773 points)
Worse design (194 points vs 635 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.89 percents vs 85.43 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (861 points vs 472 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 81 points)
Better performance (831 points vs 153 points)
Better connectivity (557 points vs 323 points)
Better display (773 points vs 198 points)
Better design (635 points vs 194 points)
Against:
Higher price (426 USD vs 68 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.43 percents vs 64.89 percents)