Sony Xperia SP vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia SP vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (70 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (21 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (32 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (72 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (328 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (37 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (125 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2370mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.59 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (319 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.78 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 70 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 21 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 32 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 72 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 328 points)
Better display (630 points vs 37 points)
Better design (670 points vs 125 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2370mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 4.59 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 319 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 66.78 percents)