Sony Xperia ZL vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia ZL vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (98.99 USD vs 94.5 USD)
Worse camera (173 points vs 600 points)
Worse battery (32 points vs 530 points)
Worse performance (122 points vs 519 points)
Worse connectivity (288 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (199 points vs 513 points)
Worse design (199 points vs 574 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.78 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2370mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (4 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.81 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (94.5 USD vs 98.99 USD)
Better camera (600 points vs 173 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 32 points)
Better performance (519 points vs 122 points)
Better connectivity (477 points vs 288 points)
Better display (513 points vs 199 points)
Better design (574 points vs 199 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.78 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 2370mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 75.81 percents)