Sony Xperia V vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia V vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (74.59 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (57 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (7 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (39 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (119 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (23 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (80 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (13.18 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1750mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.3 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (342 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (60.99 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 74.59 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 57 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 7 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 39 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 119 points)
Better display (630 points vs 23 points)
Better design (670 points vs 80 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 13.18 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 1750mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 4.3 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 342 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 60.99 percents)