Oukitel K10000 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Oukitel K10000 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (983 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (237.01 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (119 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (19 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (69 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (122 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (110 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (400 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.34 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 237.01 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 119 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 19 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 69 points)
Better display (994 points vs 122 points)
Better design (928 points vs 110 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 983 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 10000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 400 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 69.34 percents)