Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Compare Phones: Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (199.49 USD vs 215 USD)
Better connectivity (285 points vs 259 points)
Against:
Worse camera (302 points vs 679 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 857 points)
Worse performance (191 points vs 547 points)
Worse display (151 points vs 773 points)
Worse design (214 points vs 664 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (550 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (245 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.03 percents vs 84.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (679 points vs 302 points)
Better battery (857 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (547 points vs 191 points)
Better display (773 points vs 151 points)
Better design (664 points vs 214 points)
Against:
Higher price (215 USD vs 199.49 USD)
Worse connectivity (259 points vs 285 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 550 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 245 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 72.03 percents)