Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (199.49 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (303 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (191 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (284 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (151 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (214 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (550 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (245 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.03 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 199.49 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 303 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 191 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 284 points)
Better display (684 points vs 151 points)
Better design (441 points vs 214 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 550 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 245 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 72.03 percents)