Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Asus ZenFone 2 Laser ZE600KL vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (199.49 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (306 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (193 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (293 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (153 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (219 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (550 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (245 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.03 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 199.49 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 306 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 193 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 293 points)
Better display (994 points vs 153 points)
Better design (929 points vs 219 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 550 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 245 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 72.03 percents)