Sony Xperia X vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia X vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (623 points vs 512 points)
Against:
Higher price (177.88 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (606 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (59 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (287 points vs 471 points)
Worse display (229 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (265 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (22.85 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2620mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (6 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (550 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.81 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 177.88 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 606 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 59 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 287 points)
Better display (684 points vs 229 points)
Better design (441 points vs 265 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (512 points vs 623 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 22.85 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2620mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 6 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 550 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 69.81 percents)