BlackBerry Priv vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: BlackBerry Priv vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (216.29 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (178 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (268 points vs 642 points)
Worse performance (293 points vs 754 points)
Worse connectivity (636 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (661 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (242 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (17.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3410mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (6 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (544 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.4 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.06 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 216.29 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 178 points)
Better battery (642 points vs 268 points)
Better performance (754 points vs 293 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 636 points)
Better display (994 points vs 661 points)
Better design (928 points vs 242 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 17.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3410mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 6 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.4 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 544 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 71.06 percents)