Nokia Lumia 735 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia Lumia 735 vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (90.88 USD vs 94.5 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (46 points vs 600 points)
Worse battery (27 points vs 530 points)
Worse performance (37 points vs 519 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (44 points vs 513 points)
Worse design (160 points vs 574 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (6.62 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2220mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.7 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (312 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (66.2 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (600 points vs 46 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 27 points)
Better performance (519 points vs 37 points)
Better connectivity (477 points vs 46 points)
Better display (513 points vs 44 points)
Better design (574 points vs 160 points)
Against:
Higher price (94.5 USD vs 90.88 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 6.62 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 2220mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1200 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 1 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 4.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 312 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 66.2 percents)