Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (55 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (11 points vs 810 points)
Worse battery (13 points vs 309 points)
Worse performance (30 points vs 466 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 376 points)
Worse display (10 points vs 631 points)
Worse design (139 points vs 671 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1830mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (512 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (218 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.81 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (810 points vs 11 points)
Better battery (309 points vs 13 points)
Better performance (466 points vs 30 points)
Better connectivity (376 points vs 6 points)
Better display (631 points vs 10 points)
Better design (671 points vs 139 points)
Against:
Higher price (58.82 USD vs 55 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 1830mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1200 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 4.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 218 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 64.81 percents)