Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Compare Phones: Nokia Lumia 630 vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (55 USD vs 58.95 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (11 points vs 263 points)
Worse battery (13 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (30 points vs 317 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 339 points)
Worse display (10 points vs 453 points)
Worse design (139 points vs 517 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.2)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1830mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Less ram (512 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.5 inch vs 5.99 inch)
Lower pixel density (218 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.81 percents vs 77.68 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (263 points vs 11 points)
Better battery (377 points vs 13 points)
Better performance (317 points vs 30 points)
Better connectivity (339 points vs 6 points)
Better display (453 points vs 10 points)
Better design (517 points vs 139 points)
Against:
Higher price (58.95 USD vs 55 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 1830mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1200 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.99 inch vs 4.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 218 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.68 percents vs 64.81 percents)