Nokia Lumia 1320 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Compare Phones: Nokia Lumia 1320 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (82.7 USD vs 76 USD)
Worse camera (6 points vs 510 points)
Worse battery (189 points vs 533 points)
Worse performance (32 points vs 74 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 609 points)
Worse display (152 points vs 282 points)
Worse design (248 points vs 451 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.8)
Worse main camera resolution (3.77 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3400mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (1700 megahertz vs 1250 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Lower gpu frequency (400 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (245 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.56 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (76 USD vs 82.7 USD)
Better camera (510 points vs 6 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 189 points)
Better performance (74 points vs 32 points)
Better connectivity (609 points vs 6 points)
Better display (282 points vs 152 points)
Better design (451 points vs 248 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.4)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 3.77 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 400 megahertz)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1250 megahertz vs 1700 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 245 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.64 percents vs 70.56 percents)