Sony Xperia XZ vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (154.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better connectivity (843 points vs 517 points)
Against:
Worse camera (611 points vs 767 points)
Worse battery (120 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (293 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (334 points vs 689 points)
Worse design (289 points vs 449 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (22.85 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2900mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2150 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower gpu frequency (624 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (767 points vs 611 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 120 points)
Better performance (477 points vs 293 points)
Better display (689 points vs 334 points)
Better design (449 points vs 289 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 154.99 USD)
Worse connectivity (517 points vs 843 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 22.85 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2900mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 624 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2150 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 71.14 percents)