Apple iPhone 7 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone 7 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (225.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (235 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (17 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (236 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (958 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (39 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (269 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.16 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1960mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2370 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (4.7 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (326 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (65.81 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 225.99 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 235 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 17 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 236 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 958 points)
Better display (994 points vs 39 points)
Better design (928 points vs 269 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.16 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 1960mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2370 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 4.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 326 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 65.81 percents)